Signet Roasy my Deck
4.5
/ 10
Mediocre
Your problem statement is sharp, your team is solid, but your 'traction' is still living in Q2 2026. Come back when you've actually shipped something beyond mockups.

Story & Problem

7.0

You nailed the core problem of 'compromised intent' for agentic payments – a real headache for anyone letting AI handle money. Now, are there enough companies actually letting AI handle money for this to be a *current* problem, or just a future one?

Market Size

6.0

Your $1.8B SOM with a neat $350K ACV is a tidy calculation. Just confirm for me if those '5230 payment providers' are all in your 'European Series A-C' beachhead, or if you're mixing global potential with local focus.

Business Model

7.0

Your tiered pricing for 'Series C companies,' starting at $200K/year, is certainly ambitious. Let's hope your 'scoped + scheduled' pilot actually pays you those kind of numbers before you start talking about unicorn valuations.

Team

8.0

Your team has strong ZKP and identity infrastructure experience, which is exactly what this space needs. Just hope 'led systems serving 70M customers' doesn't mean your CTO was just the guy who rebooted the server for 70 million users.

Traction & GTM

2.0

'1 Pilot scoped + scheduled' and screenshots dated 2025 is not traction, it's a strong pipeline item and a prediction. The 'VCs in' slide featuring an accelerator and two logos without clear roles also leaves more questions than answers.

Design & Clarity

7.0

The design is slick and professional, certainly better than 90% of the decks I see. However, those future-dated product screenshots showing 'active agents' from 2025 are either visionary or actively misleading about current product status.

Share your score

Save for Stories

Shareable roast score card
Download

Do you want to raise funds faster?

Don't attach a PDF. Track exactly who opens your deck, which slides they read, and how long they spend — with a free Suprdeck link.

Try Suprdeck Free