Your problem statement is so generic, it could apply to literally any learning tool ever made; then you pivot so hard with 'Nanobook' that your original 'problem' is completely irrelevant.

You've listed the global e-learning market, but your 'Nanobook' pivot into B2B AI for developers and recruiters has absolutely no connection to these numbers. Are you selling learning tools or an AI assistant for talent acquisition?

Your current business model generated a whopping $0.53 per student, which is concerningly low; meanwhile, your 'Nanobook' enterprise model is a complete mystery, leaving me to guess how you'll actually make money.

The team looks solid on paper, with good engineering and growth experience, though the CFO's 'TMT clients' is generic. They might be able to pivot, but the current pitch makes it an uphill battle.

300,000+ students signed up sounds great until I calculate your $160k revenue, which means your 'traction' is fundamentally unprofitable for the business you *were* in, and completely irrelevant for the enterprise pivot.

The deck has a clean design and readable font, but the complete lack of clarity around your massive pivot from 'Palmify' to 'Nanobook' makes the entire narrative incredibly confusing, and there's a typo on the last page. C'mon.