Your problem statement on page 2 paints a vivid 'Vulnerability Gap,' but claiming to be the 'only platform that tests continuously — and fixes automatically' on page 3 is the kind of audacious confidence I appreciate, until I scroll down and see the rest of your deck.

Your $160B+ TAM on page 8 is a classic 'throw a dart at a wall' number; at least your $4.4B SAM suggests you might know which wall you're aiming for.

Your hockey stick ARR projections on page 7 are cute, but you conveniently forgot to mention *how* you plan to make money per customer beyond just 'making money.' Are we just hoping for magic?

Your founders are genuinely impressive, and those mentors are heavy hitters; it's a shame you brought a fractional CFO to a full-time capital raise.

Those 'user metrics' on page 6 are suspiciously perfect and your 'case studies' lack logos or any real detail, making them feel like a choose-your-own-adventure novel. And 'AI Pen-Tester Beta' on page 4 tells me you're still in the lab, not conquering markets.

Your design is clean, but the copyright from 2026 on page 1 makes me wonder if you're time travelers or just bad at proofreading. Also, your 'How It Works' flow on page 4 needs to be clearer if you want us to believe AI fixes code, not just creates more bugs.