You've identified a clear factory problem, but claiming '90%+ detection accuracy' without a validation sample size is like saying you're a unicorn and forgetting to mention you're still a horse.

Your 'Beachhead math' is as convincing as my nephew's lemonade stand projections, and that 'tiny unlabeled chart' on page 4 tells me you either don't know your market or don't want me to.

The $25K MRR milestone is admirable, but your own pricing implies $30K – which number should I trust? Missing CAC, payback, and churn means you haven't done the basic homework on how you actually make money.

Solid technical expertise with a former plant manager and computer vision engineer, but without enterprise sales and manufacturing partnerships, who exactly is selling this thing, your AI?

'18-24% fewer missed defects' is so vague it's almost useless, and a 1,200 person waitlist from a founder newsletter isn't traction, it's a mailing list.

You literally call out your own 'tiny unlabeled chart' and 'intentionally unlabeled axes' in the deck itself; thanks for doing my job for me on the clarity front.