Your clawdbot losing money to Alex Hormozi is relatable, but most of our LPs are still trying to figure out what an 'agentic payment' even is. You've convinced me there's a problem, but can you convince the average bank VP?

Your TAM is so inflated it's practically in orbit; $10T for AI agent e-commerce spend isn't your addressable security market, it's just the revenue stream you're hoping to skim a fraction off. Get real.

Your enterprise pricing is clear, which is good, but your D2C 'wedge' seems to be driving into a completely different market. How do 150K free users translate into a $200K ACV deal, or are we just hoping they'll tell their bank?

Your team actually has relevant experience in identity and ZKP, which is a rare sight around here. Just make sure those 70M customers weren't using your service to buy Alex Hormozi masterminds.

You claim '150K+ OpenClaw users' as your D2C wedge, then your traction slide shows '1 pilot scoped + scheduled' and two incubators. That's not a wedge; that's a plank in the eye of your credibility. Where are those 150K users?

The design is clean and easy on the eyes, a pleasant break from the usual Comic Sans disasters. If only the clarity of your traction matched the clarity of your slides.