Bleenk_AI_Investor_Deck_v2.pptx
4.5
/ 10
Mediocre
Your AI agent might build apps, but it hasn't built enough conviction for me to open my wallet; come back when your 'failed tasks' aren't a quarter of your 'completed' ones.

Story & Problem

6.0

Your problem statement is clear, like a good therapist's notes, but the promise of 'production-ready apps automatically' is so audacious it makes me wonder if your AI agents are also handling your marketing copy.

Market Size

5.0

The TAM/SAM are big, sure, but your SOM of $500M for 'startups & AI-native dev teams' is a bit like claiming you're going to eat a whole elephant because you've got a fork and a dream.

Business Model

4.0

A developer subscription *plus* usage-based AI compute? Are you running a startup or a phone plan from 2005? Make it simple, developers hate hidden fees more than they hate semicolons.

Team

6.0

A CEO who's an 'AI engineer building LLM-powered tools' and a CPO from QA? Great, you've built a solid engineering department. Now where's the visionary who's actually going to sell this thing past 100 free users?

Traction & GTM

2.0

Your 'traction' sounds like my mom trying to learn ChatGPT: '75+ AI messages sent' could be 75 attempts to ask for a cookie recipe, and 26% failed tasks doesn't scream 'production-ready,' it screams 'still in alpha'.

Design & Clarity

7.0

The deck looks clean and professional, which is great. It almost distracts from the fact that your 'traction' slide has more question marks than a bad coding interview.

Share your score

Save for Stories

Shareable roast score card
Download

Do you want to raise funds faster?

Don't attach a PDF. Track exactly who opens your deck, which slides they read, and how long they spend — with a free Suprdeck link.

Try Suprdeck Free