Your problem statement on 'knowledge gaps, fatigue, and context amnesia' is solid and backed by good data. However, the grand mission to build 'the first unified intelligence engine' feels disconnected from an actual product and is loaded with vague buzzwords.

You talk about 'knowledge workers' and plans for 'b2b rollout,' implying a massive market, yet you present absolutely no numbers for TAM, SAM, or SOM. Are we supposed to just assume it's big enough?

Your unit economics for the current product (Palmify) like 96% GM and 3.2 CAC:LTV are great, but you're asking for money to 'expand into new markets and b2b rollout' without detailing how that new enterprise model actually makes money. Speak English, not future-speak.

No team slide? None at all? You mention some impressive angels, but who is actually building this 'secure OS for knowledge work'? Is 'nanobook' being run by a sentient AI already?

Your 'strong early traction' revenue graph shows peanuts for Nanobook, but then you casually drop '330,000+ organic users' for Palmify. Which product are we funding, and why do your forecasts look like a toddler's drawing of a hockey stick after seeing your tiny actuals?

The design is clean, but the core narrative is blurrier than my vision after 18 hours of pitches. Is Nanobook a rebranding of Palmify, an enterprise spin-off, or a completely new venture? And don't even get me started on your confusing revenue figures.