“Your Berkeley degrees imply potential, but this deck reads like an unlaunched AI that's still mostly hype and placeholder content.”
Story & Problem
5.0The problem of 'archaic, inefficient PE processes' is compelling, but your solution's promised 33% time saved sounds like a hopeful guess, not a reality backed by any actual customer insights beyond '25+ analysts'.
Market Size
3.0Your market size slide is a masterclass in confusion, with 'Our Market Size' being a speck in your 'SOM'; frankly, 'TAM/SAM' is an acronym, not a credible data source.
Business Model
4.0A monthly subscription with tiered pricing using '$X' is revolutionary... if this were 2005. And two segments labeled 'Target Consumer' shows a stunning lack of precision.
Team
6.0Impressive Berkeley pedigree and big-name previous employers, but 'incoming' roles signal a team still warming up, not actively building the next unicorn.
Traction & GTM
2.0Your Go-To-Market is a standard template, and 'two firms have expressed interest' is not traction, it's polite curiosity; you're building a roadmap in 2025 with zero real-world adoption.
Design & Clarity
5.0The overall design is clean, but the 'g' on your competitor slide and the lack of actual product screenshots betray a fundamental lack of professionalism or finished product to show.
Save for Stories
Do you want to raise funds faster?
Don't attach a PDF. Track exactly who opens your deck, which slides they read, and how long they spend — with a free Suprdeck link.
Try Suprdeck Free