“Your traction is aspirational at best, and calling those logos 'investors' is bordering on creative fiction.”
Story & Problem
7.0You've articulated a genuinely interesting problem for AI payments, but burying the detailed current risks in the appendix makes me wonder if you truly grasp the urgency yourself.
Market Size
3.0Your SOM is $175M, which is quaint, but then you slap a $10T TAM in the appendix with zero connection; it's like showing me a lemonade stand and claiming you're building a global beverage empire.
Business Model
4.0You mentioned a $350K ACV, which is a number, but you've given me no discernible model or validation for how you actually plan to capture that revenue without hand-waving.
Team
8.0Your team has serious technical chops in ZKP and scaling systems; Rafal's 70M customers is impressive, but you'll need more than just engineers to actually sell this vision.
Traction & GTM
2.0A 'scoped + scheduled' paid pilot isn't traction, it's a glorified to-do list, and listing Plug and Play as a 'VC in' is a rookie move that makes me question everything else you've shown me.
Design & Clarity
6.0The design is clean, but your market map looks like a tangled hairball, and critical information is scattered between the main deck and an appendix that clearly needs a reason to exist.
Save for Stories
Do you want to raise funds faster?
Don't attach a PDF. Track exactly who opens your deck, which slides they read, and how long they spend — with a free Suprdeck link.
Try Suprdeck Free