The '11-Minute Breach' with Mr. Robot stills feels less like a real problem and more like a poorly rendered B-movie pitch. 'AI generating vulnerable code by default' sounds like an excuse, not a market opportunity.

Your $1.4T+ TAM is so astronomically large it's meaningless, and the 'SOM' looks like it was generated by the same AI writing your vulnerable code. Give me real numbers I can believe, not a fantasy novel.

A 'subscription + usage-based' model? Groundbreaking. Your projected $2M ARR by 2027 for a $10M cap suggests you're either not ambitious enough or vastly overestimating your current valuation.

Solid enterprise experience, but having an 'ex-Sequoia Partner' as an advisor yet still coming to me for money makes me question what they actually advised. Show me the results, not just the names.

Your $200K ARR is barely a pulse, and claiming '95% channel adoption' with that figure is like saying you've conquered Everest from the parking lot. That '-90% false positives' metric makes me wonder if you understand numbers or just hit the minus key by accident.

The dark mode is clean, but some of the text requires a microscope, and using stock photos from 'Mr. Robot' is about as original as a 'pivot to AI' deck. It's aesthetically pleasing, but doesn't make up for the content gaps.