Your mission to 'teach a billion kids STEM skills' is audacious, but the problem statement is so vague I'm still trying to figure out what pain point your 1988 baby picture on slide 2 is supposed to solve.

You claim a $4 Billion 'Mobile E-Learning Market' from McKinsey, but if your plan is to reach a billion kids, that's four dollars per kid; maybe scale down your ambition or find a market that doesn't feel like a rounding error for your vision.

A $9.99/month subscription is clear, but trying to reach a billion customers at that price point implies a customer acquisition cost that will bankrupt you before you teach the 1000th kid.

Finally, something decent! JPMorgan Chase, HBO, Kellogg, Obama Foundation – your resumes suggest you actually know how to build something, which is a stark contrast to the rest of this deck.

Your 'skill-based influencers' strategy is exemplified by 'Baking With Ryan' and 'Austin Millz Flips The Kanye West Sunday Service Gospel'; I'm not sure how this teaches STEM, unless you're starting a new culinary physics cult.

The design is clean enough, but the narrative jumps like a toddler on a sugar rush, and half your slides leave me more confused than before, especially that random '134' on the cover page.